laptop i7 8750h gtx 1050

dell inspiron 17 3000 laptop charger; sundance store palm desert; face similarity python; types of 40mm grenades; who is responsible to pay for a baby shower; how to turn down a contractor quote; 2 bedroom apartment for sale bondi junction; outlook email not working on iphone mail app Score 19 280 with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)(1x) and Intel Core i7-8750H Processor. Graphics Score 22 848 . Physics Score 11 197 . Combined Score 17 719 . Add to compare. Intel Core i7-8750H Processor; NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) LENOVO 20MF000BUS; 64-bit Windows 10 (10.0.17763) 19280. Percentage of results per score Processador Intel Core i7. Memória RAM de 8GB. Tela LED de 15.6". Resolução de 1920x1080 px. É anti-reflexo. Placa de vídeo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti. Conexão Wi-Fi e bluetooth. Possui 4 portas USB e porta HDMI. Inclui leitor de cartão de memória. Possui pad numérico. Modo de som Stereo. Ver características Operating System: Microsoft Windows 10 (64-bit) Dear, Currently I own a H. - HP Omen 15. - processor: Intel i7 8750H CPU /. - graphics : Intel UHD Graphics 630 + Nvidia GEFORCE GTX 1050 Ti. with the hope that it would be able to handle games and certain programs, with these graphics card. I have seen alot of videos and reviews on Youtube how it Intel Core i7 8750H 2.2-2.8GHz 8th gen CPU Nvidia GTX 1050 Ti Graphics w/ 4GB RAM Samsung 1TB 960 EVO PCIE NVME (for Windows/Mac - user upgraded from included Intel 256GB NVMe SSD) Samsung 860 EV0 500GB SSD (user upgraded) PROS • Powerful system for the money • Speed (has NVMe SSD slot and DDR4 RAM) • Runs Windows • Upgradeability Site De Rencontre Allemand 100 Gratuit. Informações BásicasMarcaDellModeloG7-7588-A30LinhaNão possuiSérieG7Características do ProdutoArmazenamento e Sem FioBluetoothWi-FiEntradas e SaídasÁudioUSB-CUSB RJ-45Leitor de cartãoQuantidades de Entradas USB4 USBMídias CompatíveisNão Possui Entrada de MídiaProcessamento e Desempenho GráficoProcessadorIntel Core i7 8750HGeração do Processador8ª GeraçãoVelocidade do OperacionalWindows 10Placa de Vídeo DedicadaGeForce GTX 1050 TiTipo de Placa de VídeoDedicada Off-BoardMemória de Vídeo VRAM da Tela/Imagem e TecladoEspecificações em10x 289 reais con 90 centavos sem jurosem10x 538 reais con 80 centavos sem jurosem10x 699 reais con 90 centavos sem jurosem10x 493 reais con 50 centavos sem jurosCalificación de 5. 18 589 reais con 90 centavos sem jurosCalificación de 5. 3 281 reais con 06 centavos Calificación de 5. 189 20 dias após sua compraCalificación de 5. 343 206 reais con 15 centavos Calificación de 5. 3 112 reais con 95 centavos Calificación de 5. 439 em 2 coresCalificación de 5. 135 649 reais con 90 centavos sem jurosCalificación de 5. 707 em 3 coresem10x 702 reais con 80 centavos sem jurosCalificación de 5. 10 359 reais con 70 centavos sem jurosCalificación de 5. 34 em 2 coresem10x 122 reais con 90 centavos sem jurosCalificación de 5. 439 em 2 coresem10x 798 reais con 90 centavos sem jurosCalificación de 5. 10 de 5. 803 367 reais con 20 centavos sem jurosCalificación de 5. 45 669 reais con 90 centavos sem jurosCalificación de 5. 707 em 3 coresem10x 369 reais con 90 centavos sem jurosUsadoem10x 619 reais con 90 centavos sem jurosUsadoem10x 419 reais con 90 centavos sem jurosUsadoem10x 699 reais con 90 centavos sem jurosUsadoem10x 699 reais con 90 centavos sem jurosUsadoem10x 499 reais con 90 centavos sem jurosUsadoem10x 373 reais con 75 centavos sem jurosUsadoUsadoDisponível em 2 coresem12x 336 reais con 41 centavos Usadoem10x 399 reais con 90 centavos sem jurosUsadoem10x 449 reais con 90 centavos sem jurosUsadoem12x 295 reais con 59 centavos Usadoem12x 316 reais con 25 centavos Usadoem12x 566 reais con 99 centavos Usadoem12x 306 reais con 36 centavos Usadoem12x 403 reais con 34 centavos Usadoem12x 296 reais con 58 centavos Usadoem12x 444 reais con 86 centavos Usadoem10x 549 reais con 90 centavos sem jurosCalificación de 5. 44 629 reais con 90 centavos sem jurosO frete grátis está sujeito ao peso, preço e distância do envio. Date Published 02 Feb 2022 Intel Core i7-8750H NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 4GB GDDR5 Full HD 1920 x 1080, IPS 120GB SSD + 1000GB HDD 2x 4GB DDR4, 2666 MHz kg lbs Pros Aggressive design with super thin bezels Stable construction with an aluminum panel 144 Hz screen with high brightness, contrast and gamut coverage AUO82ED The display doesn't harm your eyes - it doesn't use PWM AUO82ED Powerful and clear audio system Cons Short battery life Lack of Thunderbolt port Specs HDD/SSD 120GB SSD + 1TB HDD, 5400 rpm RAM 2x 4GB DDR4, 2666 MHz OS No OS Body Material Plastic / Polycarbonate, Aluminum Dimensions 365 x 257 x mm x x Weight kg lbs Ports and connectivity 1x USB Type-C Gen 1 5 Gbps 1x USB Type-A Gen 1 5 Gbps 2x USB Type-A Gen 1 5 Gbps HDMI Card Reader SD, SDHC, SDXC Ethernet LAN Wi-Fi 2x2 Bluetooth Audio jack combo audio / microphone jack Features Fingerprint reader Web camera HP Wide Vision HD Backlit keyboard Microphone Dual-Array Microphone Speakers B&O PLAY dual speakers Optical drive Security Lock slot Kensington NanoSaver Accelerometer There are 5 laptops with the same specs, All brands sorted by price CommissionsEarned More HP Pavilion Gaming 15 configurations - 199 laptops CommissionsEarned HP Pavilion Gaming 15 in-depth review HP has already had several years of experience with the Pavilion Gaming series, and last year we were pleased that the mid-range gaming solutions of the US company were getting better and better. However, Pavilion Gaming 2017 had its disadvantages such as not so good display quality with low color coverage and presence of the eye-harmful PWM. We hope they have learned from their mistakes and that these issues have been eliminated with the new model. The good news is that this is not just a refresh, but the changes are fundamental - not only does the new Pavilion Gaming sport a new chassis but now also turns its head to the high-end range thanks to its GTX 1060 Max-Q configurations. You can check the prices and configurations in our Specs System Read the full review CPU Performance Intel Core i7-8750H 3D Rendering Results are from the Cinebench 20 CPU test the higher the score, the better GPU Performance NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 4GB GDDR5 3DMark Fire Strike G Results are for the 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics benchmark the higher the score, the better Long-lasting laptop with gaming power. The Asus TUF Gaming FX705GE can run all the latest games smoothly at 1080p. The long battery life proves to be a pleasant surprise. However, the notebook does not offer a lot of ports.“TUF” The Ultimate Force notebooks from Asus are intended for price-conscious buyers. In absolute terms, our review device that retails for 1200 Euros ~$1361 is not a very cheap notebook, but it finds its place right at the bottom of the gaming segment. This notebook is no stranger to us. We have already reviewed a sibling model known as the Asus TUF Gaming FX705GM. The competing devices include the Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52, the Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH and the Schenker XMG the FX705GE and the FX705GM are identically built, we shall skip the sections that deal with the case, connectivity, input devices and the speakers. Note There are a few small differences. You can find all the appropriate information in the review of the Asus TUF Gaming GB , DDR4 2666, single-channel, two RAM slots one slot occupied inch 169, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, AU Optronics IPS, glossy noMainboardIntel Cannon Lake HM370StorageSK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831, 128 GB , + Toshiba MQ04ABF100, 1089 GB freeSoundcardRealtek ALC233 Intel Cannon Point PCH - cAVSConnections1 USB 2 USB / Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections combined audio jack, TPM RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN 10/100/1000MBit/s, Intel Wireless-AC 9560 a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/, Bluetooth x width x depth in mm x x = x x 11 inBattery64 Wh, 4240 mAh Lithium-Ion, VOperating SystemMicrosoft Windows 10 Home 64 BitCameraWebcam HDPrimary Camera MPixAdditional featuresSpeakers Stereo, Keyboard Chiclet-style, Keyboard Light yes, McAfee LiveSafe trail version, 24 Months kg = oz / pounds, Power Supply 479 g = oz / poundsNote The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar the FX705GM had a metal display lid, our current review device features a plastic display FX705GM had an RGB keyboard backlight. The FX705GE comes with a monochrome red keyboard FX705GE has a smaller fan grill. Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 Schenker XMG A707 Coffee Lake Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T DIN A4 ❌432 mm / 17 inch 290 mm / inch 29 mm / inch lbs419 mm / inch 289 mm / inch 27 mm / inch lbs413 mm / inch 305 mm / 12 inch mm / inch mm / inch mm / 11 inch mm / inch lbs297 mm / inch 210 mm / inch 1 mm / inch lbs 03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595630665TooltipAsus TUF FX705GE-EW096T Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf Ø650 547-681 Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf Ø643 499-661 Pixel arrangementThe matte display of the FX705GE operates with a native resolution of 1920x1080. The contrast ratio 10681 is good. However, the display brightness cd/m² could have been a little higher. We see a contrast ratio of 10001 and a screen brightness of at least 300 cd/m² as good. The competitors have slightly brighter displays. Positive The screen does not suffer from PWM flickering. 282cd/m²274cd/m²273cd/m²303cd/m²299cd/m²301cd/m²305cd/m²282cd/m²301cd/m² Distribution of brightnessAU Optronics i1Pro 2Maximum 305 cd/m² Nits Average cd/m² Minimum cd/m²Brightness Distribution 90 %Center on Battery 301 cd/m²Contrast 10681 Black cd/m²ΔE Color calibrated Greyscale sRGB Argyll 3D57% AdobeRGB 1998 Argyll 3D AdobeRGB 1998 Argyll 3D sRGB Argyll 3D Display P3 Argyll 3DGamma TUF FX705GE-EW096TIPS, 1920x1080, Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750HIPS, 1920x1080, XMG A707 Coffee LakeIPS, 1920x1080, Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6IPS, 1920x1080, TUF FX705GMIPS, 1920x1080, Display P3 5% 5% 6% -1% sRGB -2% -3% -1% 2% AdobeRGB 1998 -2% -3%63 -1% 0%Response Times10%8%15%73% Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *39 ?21, 18 ? 186% ? ? ? Response Time Black / White *28 ?16, 1224 ?14, 1014% ? ? ? PWM Frequency119000 ?90122000 ?95Screen-36%-38%-43%8%Brightness 10%362 21%365 22%234 -22%Brightness291318 9%350 20%341 17%228 -22%Brightness Distribution9091 1%91 1%89 -1%85 -6%Black Level * -82% -4% -14% 29%Contrast1068645 -40%1248 17%1141 7%1170 10%Colorchecker dE 2000 * -63% -101% -116% 28%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * -93% -120% -134% 36%Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * -55% -13% -5% 27%Greyscale dE 2000 * -79% -231% -251%2 8% 89% 103% 88% 83% 89%CCT6392 102%6911 94%7659 85%8066 81%6394 102%Color Space Percent of AdobeRGB 1998 -2%55 -4%56 -2%58 2%Color Space Percent of sRGB -3%84 -3%86 -1%89 2%Total Average Program / Settings-9% / -24%-10% / -25%-9% / -28%27% / 15%* ... smaller is better Screen Flickering / PWM Pulse-Width ModulationℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation PWM . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering flickering / PWM not detectedIn comparison 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19200 minimum 5 - maximum 3846000 Hz was measured. Right out of the box, the color reproduction of the display is quite good. The DeltaE 2000 color deviation of misses the target value Delta E less than 3 by a very small margin. The display does not suffer from a bluish cast. The color reproduction can be improved only minimally by way of calibration. After calibration, the DeltaE 2000 sinks to and the grayscale looks significantly more balanced. The screen fails to cover both the sRGB 87% and the Adobe RGB 57% color spaces. By means of our color profile, the color reproduction can be improved. However before downloading it, you should make sure that your laptop has the same display model manufacturer + model number as our review device, because otherwise our color profile can result in worse color reproduction. Displays from different manufacturers can often be found within notebooks from the same model range. Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry ghosting. Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16 ms rise↘ 12 ms fallThe screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for comparison, all tested devices range from minimum to 240 maximum ms. » 65 % of all devices are means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices ms. ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise↘ 18 ms fallThe screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for comparison, all tested devices range from minimum to 636 maximum ms. » 50 % of all devices are means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices 35 ms. Asus has equipped the FX705GE with an IPS panel with stable viewing angles. Therefore, the screen content can be read from any position. The display brightness is only high enough for indoor use. Outside, the screen is readable only when the sun does not shine too FX705GE outdoors shot under the shining sunThe TUF Gaming FX705GE is a gaming notebook that can run all the latest titles in Full HD. Our review device can be had for 1200 Euros ~$1361. Other hardware configurations are also available. The prices start at 900 Euros ~$1020.The FX705GE offers the three following fan modes “Overboost”, “Balanced” and “Quiet”. These modes can be selected with the help of a function key. We used the “Balanced” mode for this review. However, we also conducted a few benchmarks in “Overboost” mode. There is not a lot of difference between the two modes in terms of performance. When we used the “Quiet” mode, the Turbo boost was utilized FX705GE comes with a Core i7-8750H. It is a high-end, hexa-core Coffee Lake CPU from Intel with a TDP of 45 watts. The processor has a base clock of GHz and a boost clock of GHz for six cores, 4 GHz for four cores and GHz for one/two cores. In the multi-core section of the Cinebench R15 benchmark, the processor runs at GHz the clock speed is the same in “Overboost” mode for a few seconds. Then the clock rate sinks to to GHz 3 to GHz in “Overboost” mode. In the single-core benchmark, the CPU operates at to GHz clock speeds are identical in “Overboost” mode. When running on battery power, the processor consistently operates at GHz. We check if the Turbo boost can be used over an extended period of time by running the Cinebench R15 multi-core benchmark in a continuous loop for 30 minutes. The results fall after the first benchmark run. After that they keep fluctuating between 1000 and 1070 points. The Turbo boost is utilized. Our review device achieves similar results when running in “Overboost” mode. However, when running in this mode, we observed fewer fluctuations. In “Quiet” mode, the results fluctuate between 770 and 820 points. 065130195260325390455520585650715780845910975104011051170TooltipAsus TUF FX705GM Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H Ø1022 Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H; Overboost Ø1066 CPU clocks during the execution of the CB15 loopCinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit6236 Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit34168 Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit5456 Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit173 Points Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit1116 Points Cinebench R15 OpenGL fps Cinebench R15 Ref. Match % HelpCinebench R15 CPU Single 64BitAverage of class Gaming - 312, n=245, last 2 years 251 Points ∼77% +45%Asus TUF FX705GMIntel Core i7-8750H 175 Points ∼53% +1%Schenker XMG A707 Coffee LakeIntel Core i7-8750H 174 Points ∼53% +1%Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6Intel Core i5-8300H 173 Points ∼53% 0%Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750HIntel Core i7-8750H 173 Points ∼53% 0%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TIntel Core i7-8750H 173 Points ∼53% Average Intel Core i7-8750H 163 - 177, n=86 172 Points ∼52% -1% CPU Multi 64BitAverage of class Gaming 400 - 5663, n=244, last 2 years 2607 Points ∼27% +134%Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750HIntel Core i7-8750H 1230 Points ∼13% +10%Asus TUF FX705GMIntel Core i7-8750H 1137 Points ∼12% +2%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TIntel Core i7-8750H 1116 Points ∼11% Average Intel Core i7-8750H 863 - 1251, n=93 1113 Points ∼11% 0%Schenker XMG A707 Coffee LakeIntel Core i7-8750H 1112 Points ∼11% 0%Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6Intel Core i5-8300H 807 Points ∼8% -28%Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32BitAverage of class Gaming 5847 - 11940, n=24, last 2 years 8368 Points ∼51% +34%Average Intel Core i7-8750H 6236 - 6645, n=25 6479 Points ∼39% +4%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TIntel Core i7-8750H 6236 Points ∼38% Rendering Multiple CPUs 32BitAverage of class Gaming 30491 - 85088, n=24, last 2 years 52989 Points ∼38% +55%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TIntel Core i7-8750H 34168 Points ∼25% Average Intel Core i7-8750H 29664 - 35307, n=25 33163 Points ∼24% -3%Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core ScoreAverage Intel Core i7-8750H 20725 - 22665, n=13 21871 Points ∼27% +1%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TIntel Core i7-8750H 21635 Points ∼27% 32 Bit Single-Core ScoreAverage Intel Core i7-8750H 3734 - 4163, n=13 3995 Points ∼78% +7%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TIntel Core i7-8750H 3734 Points ∼73% Geekbench 64 Bit Multi-Core ScoreAverage of class Gaming last 2 years 38127 Points ∼93% +124%Average Intel Core i7-8750H 17048 - 22006, n=8 19665 Points ∼48% +15%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TIntel Core i7-8750H 17048 Points ∼42% 64 Bit Single-Core ScoreAverage of class Gaming last 2 years 6453 Points ∼92% +42%Average Intel Core i7-8750H 4548 - 4997, n=8 4839 Points ∼69% +6%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TIntel Core i7-8750H 4548 Points ∼65% Geekbench - 64 Bit Multi-Core ScoreAverage of class Gaming 18976 - 71700, n=33, last 2 years 43914 Points ∼49% +143%Average Intel Core i7-8750H 17709 - 23313, n=17 21069 Points ∼23% +17%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TIntel Core i7-8750H 18068 Points ∼20% 64 Bit Single-Core ScoreAverage of class Gaming 5249 - 8936, n=33, last 2 years 7154 Points ∼74% +52%Average Intel Core i7-8750H 4669 - 5146, n=17 4982 Points ∼51% +6%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TIntel Core i7-8750H 4692 Points ∼48% The laptop is very responsive. We did not encounter any problems. The notebook revealed no issues related to system performance. The Intel Core i7-8750H is a hexa-core processor that offers more than enough computing power for applications that go far beyond gaming. It will not become obsolete for years. Thanks to the inclusion of a dedicated GPU, the Asus notebook can run video games. Our review device receives good results in the PCMark benchmarks. The system performance can be further increased by enabling dual-channel mode. Doing so will increase the performance by a few percentage points. PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 4230 pointsPCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 5038 pointsPCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 5461 pointsPCMark 10 Score 4975 pointsHelp PCMark 10 ScoreAverage of class Gaming 4477 - 9331, n=197, last 2 years 7264 Points ∼72% +46%Asus TUF FX705GMGeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G 5169 Points ∼51% +4%Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750HGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G 4982 Points ∼49% 0%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831 4975 Points ∼49% Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 4532 - 5162, n=10 4851 Points ∼48% -2%Schenker XMG A707 Coffee LakeGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB 4734 Points ∼47% -5% EssentialsAverage of class Gaming 7334 - 12176, n=196, last 2 years 10462 Points ∼81% +15%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831 9110 Points ∼70% Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750HGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G 8989 Points ∼69% -1%Asus TUF FX705GMGeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G 8791 Points ∼68% -4%Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 7142 - 9110, n=10 8371 Points ∼65% -8%Schenker XMG A707 Coffee LakeGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB 7873 Points ∼61% -14% ProductivityAverage of class Gaming 6161 - 11833, n=196, last 2 years 9459 Points ∼75% +31%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831 7201 Points ∼57% Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750HGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G 7057 Points ∼56% -2%Asus TUF FX705GMGeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G 7025 Points ∼56% -2%Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 6607 - 7332, n=10 6989 Points ∼55% -3%Schenker XMG A707 Coffee LakeGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB 6920 Points ∼55% -4% Digital Content CreationAverage of class Gaming 5288 - 16424, n=196, last 2 years 10573 Points ∼53% +107%Asus TUF FX705GMGeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G 6071 Points ∼30% +19%Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 5070 - 5616, n=10 5305 Points ∼27% +4%Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750HGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G 5290 Points ∼26% +4%Schenker XMG A707 Coffee LakeGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB 5285 Points ∼26% +4%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831 5096 Points ∼25% PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2Average of class Gaming 3570 - 6657, n=42, last 2 years 5109 Points ∼77% +21%Asus TUF FX705GMGeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G 4660 Points ∼70% +10%Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, Hynix HFS128G39TND 4253 Points ∼64% +1%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831 4230 Points ∼64% Schenker XMG A707 Coffee LakeGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB 4196 Points ∼63% -1%Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 3894 - 4371, n=10 4162 Points ∼63% -2%Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750HGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G 4148 Points ∼62% -2%An NVMe SSD from SK Hynix serves as the system drive. It comes in the form-factor and has a storage capacity of 128 GB. Straight out of the box, only 89 GB is available to the user. The rest of the storage space is occupied by the recovery partition and the Windows installation files. The transfer rates of the SSD are very good. NVMe SSDs achieve significantly faster transfer speeds than SATA-III models, because they are connected via PCI Express x4. The gaming notebook offers plenty of storage space. In addition to the SSD, Asus also put a HDD 1 TB, 5400 rpm inside the Read 868 MB/s Sequential Write MB/s Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TSK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750HToshiba KBG30ZMT128GSchenker XMG A707 Coffee LakeSamsung SSD 970 EVO 250GBAcer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6Hynix HFS128G39TNDAsus TUF FX705GMWDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256GAverage SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831 Average of class Gaming CrystalDiskMark / 6-36%132%-43%102%4%423% Write -21% 12% -31% 15% ? - n=320%208 ? - 363, n=161, last 2 years130% Read -19% 11% -38% 12% ?37 - 41, n=36%70 ? - n=161, last 2 years89% Write -60%1420 343% -58%1295 304%284 ?203 - 327, n=3-11%3255 ? - 9867, n=129, last 2 years916% Read Seq1012843 -17%1307 29% -52%1325 31%772 ?271 - 1033, n=3-24%3232 ?467 - 7955, n=129, last 2 years219% Write 4K -55% 37% -31% 44%239 ? - 269, n=321%544 ? - 1656, n=160, last 2 years176% Read 4K -28% 30% -23% 18%279 ?272 - 285, n=33%716 ?291 - 6332, n=160, last 2 years164% Write Seq -51%1533 470%136 -49%1301 384%303 ?269 - 321, n=313%4135 ?436 - 14960, n=161, last 2 years1438% Read Seq Q32T115951037 -35%3554 123%553 -65%1704 7%1597 ?1589 - 1606, n=30%5622 ?958 - 18690, n=161, last 2 years252%The Asus TUF FX705GE comes with Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 1050 Ti. It is a mid-range, Pascal-based GPU. It has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, supports DirectX 12 and it runs at up to 1620 MHz. The results in the 3DMark benchmarks are on the normal level for this kind of GPU. The “Overboost” mode does not improve performance in any way. In addition to the GTX 1050 Ti, there is also Intel’s integrated UHD Graphics 630 on board. The laptop supports Nvidia’s Optimus technology that enables automatic switching between a dedicated and an integrated graphics adapter. In day-to-day use and when running on battery power, Intel’s graphics unit is used. Nvidia’s GPU is utilized when playing video games and running other graphically demanding applications. 3DMark 11 Performance 9298 points3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score 75191 points3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score 26828 points3DMark Fire Strike Score 6989 points3DMark Time Spy Score 2571 pointsHelp 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPUAverage of class Gaming 1029 - 72070, n=236, last 2 years 36561 Points ∼100% +286%Asus TUF FX705GMNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H 13722 Points ∼38% +45%Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 8304 - 10402, n=36 9591 Points ∼26% +1%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H 9466 Points ∼26% Schenker XMG A707 Coffee LakeNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H 9332 Points ∼26% -1%Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i5-8300H 9147 Points ∼25% -3%3DMark1920x1080 Fire Strike GraphicsAverage of class Gaming 781 - 53059, n=243, last 2 years 27044 Points ∼100% +247%Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750HNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H 7860 Points ∼29% +1%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H 7791 Points ∼29% Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 6792 - 8376, n=38 7743 Points ∼29% -1%Schenker XMG A707 Coffee LakeNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H 7695 Points ∼28% -1%Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i5-8300H 7610 Points ∼28% -2%1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard GraphicsAverage of class Gaming 15902 - 192520, n=169, last 2 years 122595 Points ∼100% +149%Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i5-8300H 51038 Points ∼42% +3%Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750HNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H 50732 Points ∼41% +3%Schenker XMG A707 Coffee LakeNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H 50128 Points ∼41% +2%Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 43721 - 53978, n=37 50013 Points ∼41% +1%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H 49314 Points ∼40% 2560x1440 Time Spy GraphicsAverage of class Gaming 224 - 22547, n=243, last 2 years 10728 Points ∼100% +323%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H 2536 Points ∼24% Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 1990 - 2536, n=16 2309 Points ∼22% -9%The CPU-GPU combination of the Asus notebook can run all the latest games smoothly. Our review device can achieve playable frames in most titles at 1080p resolution the screen resolution is also 1080p. In terms of graphics settings, you will have to stick to medium or high presets in most cases. There are only a few games that can run on the highest settings. Only titles that have low system requirements can be played at resolutions above 1080p you will need an external monitor to achieve resolutions higher than 1080p.The FX705GE does not ship with the latest Nvidia drivers. Our review device features the Nvidia GeForce WHQL drivers. You cannot download the latest driver package from Asus’s website. The Windows update function also does not offer any newer drivers. Unfortunately, the drivers downloaded directly from Nvidia’s website cannot be installed. It would appear as though only drivers that were customized by Asus can be ran the video game The Witcher 3 for one hour on the highest settings to see if the performance of the laptop falls during long gaming sessions. Over the entire run of gameplay, the player-controlled character stands still. We did not observe any frame-rate performance during the stress test with The Witcher 3When idle, the fans often stand still, which leads to silent operation - except when the hard drive is being accessed. Otherwise, the fans run at a low speed. However, under load, the fans really start to spin up. Here, we measured a sound pressure level of dBA. Under medium load, the system noise amounts to 43 dBA. Those who want less noise should enable the “Quiet” mode. In this mode, the fans operate less frequently and at lower speeds, which is why the boost clocks of the CPU are considerably lower. Unfortunately, our review device suffers from occasional coil whine. Noise Level Idle / / dBAHDD dBALoad 43 / dBA 30 dBsilent40 dBAaudible50 dBAloud min , med , max Audix TM1, Arta 15 cm distance environment noise dBA dBA 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus TUF FX705GE-EW096TThe FX705GE during the stress testThe FX705GE completes our stress test Prime95 and FurMark running continuously for at least one hour with different results. When plugged in, the CPU runs at to GHz and the GPU operates at 1500 to 1700 MHz. When running on battery power, the CPU is throttled down to 800 MHz and the core clock of the GPU fluctuates between 1000 and 1050 notebook does not become excessively hot. During the stress test, the 50 °C 122 °F mark is exceeded only at one measurement point. In everyday use, the temperatures always stay within reasonable bounds. The stress test is an extreme case scenario, which is very unlikely to occur in real life. We use it to test system stability. °C106 °C104 °C114 F °C87 °C128 F34 °C93 F °C79 °C78 °C80 F Maximum °C = 128 FAverage °C = 97 F °C94 °C107 °C112 °C78 °C90 °C86 F26 °C79 °C80 °C80 F Maximum °C = 112 FAverage 32 °C = 90 F Power Supply max. °C = 110 F Room Temperature °C = 74 F FIRT 550-Pocket± The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is °C / 97 F, compared to the average of °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.- The maximum temperature on the upper side is °C / 128 F, compared to the average of °C / 105 F, ranging from to °C for the class Gaming.± The bottom heats up to a maximum of °C / 112 F, compared to the average of °C / 110 F+ In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of °C / 93 F.+ The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of °C / F and are therefore cool to the touch. + The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was °C / 84 F + °C / F. dBA 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus TUF FX705GE-EW096TApple MacBook 12 Early 2016 GHzFrequency diagram checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devicesAsus TUF FX705GE-EW096T audio analysis± speaker loudness is average but good dBBass 100 - 315 Hz- nearly no bass - on average 25% lower than median± linearity of bass is average delta to prev. frequencyMids 400 - 2000 Hz± reduced mids - on average lower than median± linearity of mids is average delta to prev. frequencyHighs 2 - 16 kHz± higher highs - on average higher than median+ highs are linear delta to prev. frequencyOverall 100 - Hz- overall sound is not linear 30% difference to medianCompared to same class» 97% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 2% worse» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 47%Compared to all devices tested» 92% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 5% worse» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%Apple MacBook 12 Early 2016 GHz audio analysis+ speakers can play relatively loud dBBass 100 - 315 Hz± reduced bass - on average lower than median± linearity of bass is average delta to prev. frequencyMids 400 - 2000 Hz+ balanced mids - only away from median+ mids are linear delta to prev. frequencyHighs 2 - 16 kHz+ balanced highs - only 2% away from median+ highs are linear delta to prev. frequencyOverall 100 - Hz+ overall sound is linear difference to medianCompared to same class» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 95% worse» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 50%Compared to all devices tested» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%The power consumption is well within the normal range for this type of hardware. When idle, we measured a maximum power draw of watts. During the stress test, the energy consumption peaked at watts. The power output of the included AC adapter amounts to 120 watts. Note When idle, the notebook consumes less than half the power that its sibling model consumed. In all likelihood, this can be attributed to the fact that Nvidia’s Optimus technology did not function correctly on the sibling model. Our practically oriented Wi-Fi test simulates loads that are consistent with surfing the web. The “balanced” power plan is selected, the display brightness is set to 150 cd/m² and the energy-saving functions are switched off. The Asus TUF FX705GE achieves a battery runtime of 8 h 33 m, which is a very good result. Many office notebooks have shorter battery life. Our current review device lasts twice as long as its sibling model. We already mentioned the reason for this The sibling model consumes significantly more energy under low Runtime WiFi Websurfing Edge 44 8h 33min Battery Runtime - WiFi WebsurfingAsus TUF FX705GE-EW096Ti7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 64 Wh 513 min ∼19% Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750Hi7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 76 Wh 402 min ∼15% -22%Schenker XMG A707 Coffee Lakei7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 62 Wh 378 min ∼14% -26%Average of class Gaming 57 - 745, n=184, last 2 years 363 min ∼14% -29%Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 48 Wh 354 min ∼13% -31%Asus TUF FX705GMi7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 64 Wh 272 min ∼10% -47%Pros+ matte IPS screen + Full HD resolution + compact case + NVMe SSD + HDD + very good battery life + backlit keyboardCons- not a lot of ports - no USB Type-C - no SD card reader - a lot of noise under loadThe Asus TUF Gaming FX705GE-EW096T, provided courtesy of Asus TUF Gaming FX705GE is an entry-level gaming notebook. The combination of a Core i7-8750H and a GeForce GTX 1050 Ti can run all the games in our benchmark library smoothly. However, you will have to lower the resolution and graphics settings in some of the latest AAA titles in order to achieve playable frame Asus TUF Gaming FX705GE is a true gaming laptop that also works well as a notebook for daily tasks. However, it does not feature a lot of NVMe SSD helps create a very responsive system. Even though its capacity amounts only to 128 GB, there is no lack of storage space. The laptop features an additional 1 TB hard drive. Moreover, the notebook also comes with a usable, backlit keyboard. The FX705GE surprises when it comes to battery runtimes. In our Wi-Fi test, it lasts for 8 h 33 m, which is why it beats most office notebooks in terms of battery Full HD IPS screen has a matte surface, good contrast ratio and stable viewing angles. The brightness is okay. However, it could have been higher given the price tag of the FX705GE does not feature plenty of ports. Here, Asus chose to go the minimalist route to differentiate its more premium ROG gaming notebooks from cheaper TUF gaming laptops. The FX705GE has neither an SD card reader nor a USB Type-C port. Furthermore, it offers only one video output. Here, competitors with the same CPU-GPU combination such as the Schenker XMG A707 and the Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH offer significantly more. The Lenovo notebook actually comes with a Thunderbolt 3 port. Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T - 02/18/2019 v6old Sascha Mölck Connectivity47 / 81 → 58% Application Performance94% Gaming - Weighted Average Pricecompare Editor of the original article Sascha Mölck - Senior Tech Writer - 961 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2012What started as a side job during my computer science studies later became my main job For more than 20 years now I have been working as an editor and author in the IT sector. While working in the print sector I also contributed to the creation of various loose-leaf publications and published original written pieces. I have been working for Notebookcheck since 2012. Sascha Mölck, 2019-02-19 Update 2019-02-21

laptop i7 8750h gtx 1050